Negatives of Maximizing Shareholder Value (2024)

Public corporations are businesses that choose to sell shares of stock to the public to raise money and finance growth. The executive board members and high-level managers that run corporations often focus on increasing "shareholder value," which describes the return shareholders derive from their investment. Maximizing shareholder value is achieved by increasing a stock's price over time and by increasing dividends. The focus of corporations on maximizing shareholder value is often criticized because it potentially can have several negative consequences.

Bad Business Practices

  1. One potential drawback of the tendency of corporations to focus on maximizing shareholder value is that it can lead to poor or unsustainable business practices. For example, leading up to the global recession that began in the late 2000s, many financial institutions in the U.S. gave mortgages to borrowers who had poor credit in the hopes of making as much profit as possible. While such practices may have led to short-term gains, the resulting mass defaults and foreclosures eventually forced banks to absorb huge losses. In some cases, businesses partake in illegal or unethical activities, such as falsifying financial information, in order to boost shareholder value. Excessive focus on shareholder value is commonly cited as a factor that contributed to the recession that began in late 2007, which some have called the "Great Recession."

Forgetting About the Customer

  1. Corporations that concentrate on maximizing shareholder value might lose focus on what customers want, or might do things that are not optimal for consumers. For instance, a corporation might choose to cut production costs by using lower-quality parts in its products. While this might boost profits and the price of its stock, it is bad for consumers. Over time, this can tarnish the reputation of the company and its products, resulting in the opposite of the intended effect by lowering the value of its stock.

Employment and Outsourcing

  1. Another negative consequence of shareholder value maximization is that it can hurt employees. The lower a corporation's costs, the more profit it stands to make if its total revenue is constant, so corporations can benefit from cutting employee benefits and wages. If domestic labor is not cheap enough or not productive enough, businesses can outsource labor to foreign workers who are willing to work for lower wages.

Corporate Involvement in Politics

  1. Government regulations and taxes can reduce shareholder value. As result, corporations often contribute money to help certain politicians or political parties, and lobby politicians in an effort to get the government to pass legislation that is favorable to them. Since corporations often have huge amounts of money at their disposal, they can be far more influential than any single voter. Politicians are sometimes criticized for acting in the best interests of corporations rather than in the best interests of citizens.

Negatives of Maximizing Shareholder Value (2024)

FAQs

Negatives of Maximizing Shareholder Value? ›

Employment and Outsourcing

What is the problem with maximizing shareholder value? ›

It's easier for leaders to focus on one just stakeholder, the shareholders. But being easier doesn't make it right. “Maximizing shareholder value” puts too much emphasis on short-term profitability that negatively impacts strategic investments and innovation.

What is one of the primary disadvantages of maximizing shareholder value? ›

One of the primary disadvantages of maximizing shareholder value is that it only provides a short - term perspective.

What are the negatives of shareholder value? ›

Negative shareholders' equity is a warning sign that a business could be facing financial distress. A company might have taken on too much debt or could be otherwise overspending.

What is the main downside of making decisions based on maximizing shareholder wealth? ›

However, shareholder wealth maximization can be a negative if it encourages questionable behavior and decisions at the expense of society, the environment, and the company's own long-term sustainability.

What are the disadvantages of value maximization? ›

Another negative consequence of shareholder value maximization is that it can hurt employees. The lower a corporation's costs, the more profit it stands to make if its total revenue is constant, so corporations can benefit from cutting employee benefits and wages.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of maximizing shareholder wealth? ›

Advantages and Disadvantages of Wealth Maximization

Wealth maximization offers a clear financial objective with potential benefits like long-term growth and shareholder satisfaction. However, it can also lead to ethical and risk-related challenges and may not always align with the interests of all stakeholders.

Is shareholder wealth maximization a dumbest idea? ›

Even the legendary Jack Welch has come to see that maximizing shareholder value is “the dumbest idea in the world. “On the face of it, shareholder value is the dumbest idea in the world,” Welch said, “Shareholder value is a result, not a strategy…

What are the criticisms of shareholder value? ›

While a focus on shareholder value can benefit the owners of a corporation financially, it does not provide a clear measure of social issues like employment, environmental issues, or ethical business practices. A management decision can maximize shareholder value while lowering the welfare of third parties.

What are the disadvantages of shareholder value analysis? ›

The disadvantages of the shareholder value approach: It's difficult to give an evaluation of future monetary proceeds with complete accuracy because an organization might base its decisions on misleading or incorrect figures.

What is one problem with maximization of shareholder wealth? ›

One problem with maximization of shareholder wealth as a goal is that it ignores risk taken by the firm's financial decisions. Shareholders react to poor investment or dividend decisions by causing the total value of the firm's stock to fall, and they react to good decisions by bidding the price of the stock up.

Is there a conflict between maximizing shareholder wealth and never paying bribes? ›

Answer and Explanation:

So, a firm that abstains from paying bribes could be at a competitive disadvantage. Theoretically, this conflicts with the aspiration to maximize shareholder wealth.

Should corporations maximize shareholder wealth or stakeholder value? ›

Corporate management and investor actions have focused almost exclusively on increasing shareholder returns as the primary goal and determinant of corporate success. The doctrine is referred to commonly as the shareholder wealth maximization theory (SWM or simply “shareholder theory”).

What are the difficulties of achieve shareholder wealth maximization? ›

The problems involved in implementing the goal of maximizing shareholder wealth are: Wrong assumptions, speculation, different objectives, and fair treatment to all social groups.

Why is maximizing shareholder value finally dying in Forbes? ›

By 2019, maximizing shareholder value has come to be seen as leading to a toxic mix of soaring short-term corporate profits, astronomic executive pay, along with stagnant median incomes, growing inequality, periodic massive financial crashes, declining corporate life expectancy, slowing productivity, declining rates of ...

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Rubie Ullrich

Last Updated:

Views: 5634

Rating: 4.1 / 5 (52 voted)

Reviews: 83% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Rubie Ullrich

Birthday: 1998-02-02

Address: 743 Stoltenberg Center, Genovevaville, NJ 59925-3119

Phone: +2202978377583

Job: Administration Engineer

Hobby: Surfing, Sailing, Listening to music, Web surfing, Kitesurfing, Geocaching, Backpacking

Introduction: My name is Rubie Ullrich, I am a enthusiastic, perfect, tender, vivacious, talented, famous, delightful person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.