Quadro P600 2017 2 GB GDDR5, 25 Watt 8.46 +46.6% Quadro K620 2014 2 GB 128-bit, 41 Watt 5.77 GTX 1650 GTX 1060 6 GB RTX 3060 RTX 4060 RTX 4070 SUPER RTX 4080 SUPER RTX 4090 RX 580 RX 5700 Arc A580 RX 7600 XT RX 7800 XT RX 7900 XTX P600 outperforms K620 by a considerable 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results. Quadro P600 Quadro K620 GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared. Performance to price ratio. The higher, the better. Quadro P600 has 644% better value for money than Quadro K620. General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, but for precise assessment you have to consider their benchmark and gaming test results.Note that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked. Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility). Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM. Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself. Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes. List of supported graphics and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions. Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale. This is our combined benchmark performance score. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you find some perceived inconsistencies, feel free to speak up in comments section, we usually fix problems quickly. Quadro P6008.46 +46.6% Quadro K6205.77 P600 outperforms K620 by 47% based on our aggregate benchmark results. This isthe most ubiquitous GPU benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities. Benchmark coverage: 25% Quadro P6003271 +46.6% Quadro K6202232 P600 outperforms K620 by 47% in Passmark. Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation usesOpenCLAPI by Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 9% Quadro P60010548 +59.5% Quadro K6206615 P600 outperforms K620 by 59% in GeekBench 5 OpenCL. Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation usesVulkanAPI by AMD & Khronos Group. Benchmark coverage: 5% Quadro P6009715 +65.3% Quadro K6205878 P600 outperforms K620 by 65% in GeekBench 5 Vulkan. Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU's processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation usesCUDAAPI by NVIDIA. Benchmark coverage: 4% Quadro P60010634 +59.8% Quadro K6206653 P600 outperforms K620 by 60% in GeekBench 5 CUDA. Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS. Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions: +48.1% −48.1% Full HD +62.5% −62.5% Full HD +70% −70% +50% −50% +62.5% −62.5% +50% −50% +62.5% −62.5% +62.5% −62.5% +64.3% −64.3% +66.7% −66.7% +58.3% −58.3% +61.1% −61.1% +50% −50% +50% −50% +50% −50% +55.6% −55.6% Full HD +70% −70% +50% −50% +62.5% −62.5% +50% −50% +62.5% −62.5% +62.5% −62.5% +64.3% −64.3% +66.7% −66.7% +58.3% −58.3% +61.1% −61.1% +50% −50% +50% −50% +50% −50% +56.3% −56.3% +55.6% −55.6% Full HD +70% −70% +50% −50% +50% −50% +62.5% −62.5% +62.5% −62.5% +66.7% −66.7% +61.1% −61.1% +50% −50% +55.6% −55.6% +55.6% −55.6% Full HD +50% −50% 1440p +60% −60% +62.5% −62.5% +57.1% −57.1% +50% −50% 1440p +75% −75% +100% −100% +66.7% −66.7% +100% −100% +62.5% −62.5% +50% −50% +50% −50% +57.1% −57.1% +50% −50% +60% −60% +100% −100% 4K +50% −50% +75% −75% +66.7% −66.7% +50% −50% +100% −100% +66.7% −66.7% 4K +66.7% −66.7% +100% −100% +50% −50% +100% −100% +66.7% −66.7% +50% −50% +50% −50% +50% −50% 4K +60% −60% This is how Quadro P600 and Quadro K620 compete in popular games: The Quadro P600 is our recommended choice as it beats the Quadro K620 in performance tests. Should you still have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Do you think we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" button near your favorite graphics card. Quadro P600 Quadro K620 Like Like We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider. Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself. 3.6152 votes Rate Quadro P600 on a scale of 1 to 5: 3.7565 votes Rate Quadro K620 on a scale of 1 to 5: Here you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.Aggregate performance score
Contents
Primary details
Place in performance ranking 467 563 Place by popularity not in top-100 not in top-100 Cost-effectiveness evaluation 9.15 1.23 Architecture Pascal (2016−2021) Maxwell (2014−2018) GPU code name GP107 GM107 Market segment Workstation Workstation Release date 14 November 2017 (6 years ago) 22 July 2014 (9 years ago) Launch price (MSRP) $178 $189.89 Current price $207 (1.2x MSRP) $286 (1.5x MSRP) Cost-effectiveness evaluation
Detailed specifications
Pipelines / CUDA cores 384 384 Core clock speed 1430 MHz 1058 MHz Boost clock speed 1620 MHz 1124 MHz Number of transistors 3,300 million 1,870 million Manufacturing process technology 14 nm 28 nm Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 41 Watt Texture fill rate 37.37 26.98 Floating-point performance 1,117 gflops 863.2 gflops Form factor & compatibility
Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 2.0 x16 Length 145 mm 160 mm Width 1-slot 1" (2.5 cm) Supplementary power connectors None None VRAM capacity and type
Memory type GDDR5 128 Bit Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 2 GB Memory bus width 64 Bit 128 Bit Memory clock speed 5012 MHz 1800 MHz Memory bandwidth 64.13 GB/s Up to 29 GB/s Shared memory - no data Connectivity and outputs
Display Connectors 4x mini-DisplayPort DVI-I DP Number of simultaneous displays no data 4 Supported technologies
3D Vision Pro no data + Mosaic no data + nView Desktop Management no data + API compatibility
DirectX 12 (12_1) 12 Shader Model 6.4 5 OpenGL 4.6 4.5 OpenCL 1.2 1.2 Vulkan 1.2.131 + CUDA 6.1 5.0 Synthetic benchmark performance
Combined synthetic benchmark score
Passmark
GeekBench 5 OpenCL
GeekBench 5 Vulkan
GeekBench 5 CUDA
Gaming performance
Average FPS across all PC games
Full HD 40 27−30 FPS performance in popular games
Low PresetCyberpunk 2077 12−14 8−9
Medium PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18 10−11 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 8−9 Battlefield 5 24−27 16−18 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 12−14 Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 8−9 Far Cry 5 24−27 16−18 Far Cry New Dawn 21−24 14−16 Forza Horizon 4 30−33 18−20 Hitman 3 18−20 12−14 Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30 18−20 Metro Exodus 24−27 16−18 Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 16−18 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27 16−18 Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 9−10
High PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18 10−11 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 8−9 Battlefield 5 24−27 16−18 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 12−14 Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 8−9 Far Cry 5 24−27 16−18 Far Cry New Dawn 21−24 14−16 Forza Horizon 4 30−33 18−20 Hitman 3 18−20 12−14 Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30 18−20 Metro Exodus 24−27 16−18 Red Dead Redemption 2 24−27 16−18 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 24−27 16−18 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 25 16−18 Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 9−10
Ultra PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 16−18 10−11 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 12−14 8−9 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 18−20 12−14 Cyberpunk 2077 12−14 8−9 Far Cry 5 24−27 16−18 Forza Horizon 4 30−33 18−20 Horizon Zero Dawn 27−30 18−20 Metro Exodus 24−27 16−18 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 14 9−10 Watch Dogs: Legion 14−16 9−10
Epic PresetRed Dead Redemption 2 24−27 16−18
High PresetBattlefield 5 16−18 10−11 Far Cry New Dawn 12−14 8−9 Hitman 3 10−12 7−8 Red Dead Redemption 2 6−7 4−5
Ultra PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 7−8 4−5 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 2−3 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 10−11 6−7 Cyberpunk 2077 4−5 2−3 Far Cry 5 12−14 8−9 Forza Horizon 4 14−16 10−11 Horizon Zero Dawn 18−20 12−14 Metro Exodus 10−12 7−8 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 9−10 6−7 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 8−9 5−6 Watch Dogs: Legion 4−5 2−3
High PresetFar Cry 5 21−24 14−16 Far Cry New Dawn 7−8 4−5 Hitman 3 5−6 3−4 Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10 6−7 Shadow of the Tomb Raider 4−5 2−3 The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 3−4
Ultra PresetAssassin's Creed Odyssey 5−6 3−4 Assassin's Creed Valhalla 4−5 2−3 Battlefield 5 6−7 4−5 Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 4−5 2−3 Cyberpunk 2077 1−2 0−1 Forza Horizon 4 10−11 6−7 Horizon Zero Dawn 9−10 6−7 Metro Exodus 9−10 6−7 Watch Dogs: Legion 3−4 2−3
Epic PresetRed Dead Redemption 2 8−9 5−6 Pros & cons summary
Performance score 8.46 5.77 Recency 14 November 2017 22 July 2014 Cost $178 $189.89 Chip lithography 14 nm 28 nm Power consumption (TDP) 25 Watt 41 Watt Vote for your favorite
![K620 vs P600 [4-Benchmark Showdown] (5)](https://i0.wp.com/technicalcity.b-cdn.net/en/video_logotypes/3/image?thumbnail=yes&maxwidth=38&maxheight=38 "K620 vs P600 [4-Benchmark Showdown] (5)")
Comparisons with similar GPUs
Community ratings
![K620 vs P600 [4-Benchmark Showdown] (29)](https://i0.wp.com/technicalcity.b-cdn.net/images/smile_sad.png "K620 vs P600 [4-Benchmark Showdown] (29)")
![K620 vs P600 [4-Benchmark Showdown] (30)](https://i0.wp.com/technicalcity.b-cdn.net/images/smile.png "K620 vs P600 [4-Benchmark Showdown] (30)")
Questions & comments
QuadroP600 vsFireProW4100
QuadroK620 vsFireProW2100
QuadroP600 vsQuadroP2000
QuadroP600 vsQuadroK420
QuadroP600 vsQuadroK2200
QuadroP600 vsQuadroK1200
QuadroP600 vsNVS810
QuadroP600 vsGRIDK2
QuadroP600 vsGRIDK1
QuadroP600 vsNVS315
QuadroP600 vsQuadroK2000
![K620 vs P600 [4-Benchmark Showdown] (2024)]()